Michael sent me this story that was also in this morning’s Atlanta Urinal and Constipation.
WASHINGTON (AP) — Biofuels made from the leftovers of harvested corn plants are worse than gasoline for global warming in the short term, a study shows, challenging the Obama administration’s conclusions that they are a much cleaner oil alternative and will help combat climate change.
They’re worse for car engines as well.
A $500,000 study paid for by the federal government and released Sunday in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Climate Change concludes that biofuels made with corn residue release 7 percent more greenhouse gases in the early years compared with conventional gasoline.
Bad for engines and bad for the environment. A twofer. And this is from a study sponsored by the federal gummint.
While biofuels are better in the long run,
Bullshit! Bullshit! Bullshit!
the study says they won’t meet a standard set in a 2007 energy law to qualify as renewable fuel.
The conclusions deal a blow to what are known as cellulosic biofuels, which have received more than a billion dollars in federal support but have struggled to meet volume targets mandated by law. About half of the initial market in cellulosics is expected to be derived from corn residue.
Another boondoggle.
The biofuel industry and administration officials immediately criticized the research as flawed. They said it was too simplistic in its analysis of carbon loss from soil, which can vary over a single field, and vastly overestimated how much residue farmers actually would remove once the market gets underway.
Of course the biofuel industry is against this study. They want the gravy train to continue.
Ethanol. A bad idea that costs more than it is worth, especially since we are nowhere near running out of oil or natural gas. Do you wanna talk about corporate welfare and crony capitalism? Look no further than the biofuel industry.